AI vision for real-time surgical instrument counting, classification, and verification.
Manual instrument counting requires sustained attention during high-pressure procedures. Teams need a clear way to compare observed instruments with the expected set and review discrepancies before case completion.
Procedure-side cameras and AI-assisted recognition support initial, added-items, and final counts. AutoSurgical compares observed instruments with the selected set, displays missing, extra, and complete states, and retains each capture for review.
Add AI-assisted recognition to the instrument verification workflow.
Flag missing or unexpected instruments for review.
Create a documented procedure-side audit trail.
Procedure-side cameras observe the instrument field and identify tools as they enter the workflow.
Initial, added-items, and final counts compare observed instruments with the expected procedure set and show missing, extra, or complete states.
Open discrepancies are surfaced to the surgical team for review, while capture history supports documented reconciliation. AutoSurgical supports, but does not replace, the facility’s required count procedures.
OR Control tracks initial, added-items, and final counts against the selected instrument set. A hospital-managed instrument catalogue provides the reference images and expected set lists used during verification, while capture history retains each recognized-instrument record for later review.
AutoSurgical OR Control keeps the procedure stage, live camera view, captured instruments, and set-level verification results together. Staff can review missing, extra, and complete results before completing the configured reconciliation workflow.
Follow instrument registration and set definition through procedure-stage counts, exception review, reconciliation, and final workflow completion.
AutoSurgical Instrument Verification Guide
Support real-time instrument identification and verification during active procedures.
Compare detected instruments against expected counts and flag discrepancies for review.
Create a time-stamped record of instrument activity to support post-case review.
Use a separate set-verification workflow to compare the prepared tray with its standard list before or after a procedure.
Evaluate set verification within approved preparation or reprocessing workflows before presenting it as a deployed use case.
Use a common verification workflow across surgical sites and procedure teams.
Plan each deployment around the people, systems, review steps, and governance requirements already in place.
Start with the healthcare workflow where the need is clearest, validate value with the clinical team, and expand across the portfolio on the same connected foundation.